The Real Presence in Preaching

Some of the recent criticism of “the centrality of the word” in the worship service has arisen due to the fear of rationalism and an over-intellectualizing of the gospel. Combined with the ongoing liturgical renewal, folks will also challenge this concept for being gnostic, supposing that stimulating our brains is much more important than our bodies.

There may be well something to these fears when we have in mind the entity that they are currently responding to, but it is just as important to pay careful attention to the historic position of the Reformers when they advocated the centrality of the word. They had something specific in mind, and it may not be the same thing that we think of today.

In fact, there’s no reason to pit the word in opposition to the sacraments or the liturgy because all of these are working towards the same goal. Every aspect of Christian worship is for the purpose of receiving Jesus Christ. This is true of the sermon as much as the Eucharist. On this note, Paul Avis writes:

For the Reformers, the word is nothing less than Christ, revealing and communicating himself to us in divers ways– through the Scriptures, the preaching of the gospel, the Christian brother or sister, or the visible words of baptism or communion. These are all facets of the external word. As Calvin says: ‘The sacraments are to be ranked in the same place as the word; so while the gospel is called the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, we do not hesitate to transfer the same title to the sacraments’ (TT 2.4000). And again: ‘Let it be a fixed point that the office of sacraments differs not from the word of God; and this is to hold forth and offer Christ to us, and in him the treasures of heavenly grace’ (Inst. IV.xiv.17). The treasure of the Church, writes Luther, is the word, for the word includes all divine figts and graces- Verbum, Baptismus, Eucharistia, gubernatio divina, consolatio conscienciarum, timor Dei, fiducia in Deum, pacientia Dei, imitacio Christi etc (WA 40 II.549f.).

The Church in the Theology of the Reformers pg. 82

Avis explains this concept more by showing that the Reformers put the same qualifications on the necessity of the Spirit for the efficacy of preaching as they did for the sacraments. He states:

The external oral word is dependent for its effect on the secret inner word spoken by the Holy Spirit in the hearts of men and without this it is of no avail. The Church, writes Bucer, ‘is born through the word; not through the word of the outward sermon or Scripture alone, but through the living word which God speaks in the heart. This does not sound differently from the outward word, indeed, it is one and the same word, except that God has made it live in the heart.’ Zwingli makes the same distinction between internal and eternal word. The word we hear in the sermon has not in itself the power to make us believe, ‘for if we were rendered faithful by that word which is read and heard, evidently all of us should be faithful, for somewhere or other all of us have either read or heard the word, especially in these days in which all things, even woods and fields, re-echo the gospel.’ It is, however, sadly all too evident, that ‘many both hear and see yet have not faith’. Faith is born of ‘that word which the heavenly Father proclaims in our hearts, by which also he illumines us so that we understand and draws us so that we follow’. This is the word that ‘resides in the minds of the faithful’.

pg. 84

It must also be added that the res of the preached word is always united with the sign- if I can use there terms- in that it is very unusual for one to be inwardly enlightened by the Word unless he hears the preached word. The outward and the inward go together in preaching as well as in the sacraments.

This should affect our view of preaching, especially as we are renewing interest in the sacraments. The entire worship service needs to be both mystical and intelligible, held together in that sacred bond.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in church history, preaching by Steven Wedgeworth. Bookmark the permalink.

About Steven Wedgeworth

Steven Wedgeworth is the pastor of Christ Church in Lakeland, FL. He is also a founder and general editor of The Calvinist International. A graduate of Reformed Theological Seminary (Jackson, MS), a full-time minister, and occasional classical school teacher, Steven lives in Lakeland, FL with his wife, son, and daughter.

3 thoughts on “The Real Presence in Preaching

  1. One of my Roman Catholic colleagues has visited a local PCA church on several occasions. Given the infrequency of communion at the time, and general lack of “sacramentality,” she asked one of the pastors, if the central role of the pastor was simply to give a 40 minute lecture, who do we restrict the office only to males.

    I’m not sure what he responded but she didn’t find it particularly compelling. So I explained to her that in the Reformed tradition the preaching of the Word is the Word of God – that’s to say, preaching is sacramental, a means by which Christ is truly present and speaks to his gathered flock.

    She still had questions, but that understanding of the ministry of the Word made sense for her of our restricting its ministry to males.

  2. Love this post. I was thinking about this the other day in church. I was wondering what the early reformers meant when insisting on the centrality of the Word. These days it seems to be taken for granted that the sermon is what is being referred to and therefore is the most important thing in the worship service. I go to an REC church and the sermon is not as central as it is in a typical reformed presby church today, but throughout the liturgy the Word as you have laid it out here is without question still the center and focus. This seems to be the more biblical approach IMO.

  3. If a Church is utilizing a good, historic liturgy, there’s no need for a long sermon. The Word has already been read and proclaimed far more than in any typical evangelical service, even in ones with 45 minute sermon-lectures. There’s also no need for “prayer meetings,” but that’s another topic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s