After I posted my essay on head of household voting, Pastor Douglas Wilson was kind enough to link to it and add his thoughts. In the comments, however, RC Sproul Jr added his opinion that women should not be allowed to vote at all, even if they are heads of households, because this would be an example of women having “authority” or “rule” over a man. It is not my intention to “go after” Dr. Sproul on this point, but I do think it’s a good opportunity for me to further clarify my own position and show that it is distinct from “male only” voting. I think that Dr. Sproul’s concerns are founded on faulty reasoning, and as such, I think that women can be heads of households in certain conditions and that, in those conditions, they can and should vote, if the congregation chooses to have such a style of voting. Continue reading
I can’t think of any better time to get back to discussing Douglas Wilson’s treatment of masculinity and parenting in Father Hunger: Why God Calls Men to Love and Lead Their Families. Can you? :) I’ve also noticed that my review copy is about 10pgs off the pagination of the regular copies. Hopefully since we’re going chapter by chapter, you can figure out where I am. We’ll currently be reviewing chapter 3 “A Culture of Absenteeism.”
Wilson begins this chapter by noting that we live in fatherless times. He quotes David Blankenhorn who states that “Fatherlessness is now approaching a rough parity with fatherhood as a defining feature of American childhood” (29). The obvious expression of this is in single-mother homes, but it can also exist practically within households that still have both parents. “If fathers are on the premises, but don’t know what is expected of them, we have another kind of fatherlesness,” writes Wilson (30). Continue reading
The role of a father as a provider and protector is not an arbitrary assignment given to an arbitrarily selected group, regardless of any other consideration. Here is the mandate given to Adam (Gen. 2:15)–God wants men both to work and protect. Work has to do with nurture and cultivation, while protection refers to a man’s duty to be a fortress for his family. We find a working definition of masculinity in the first few pages of the Bible. (18)
“Creation ordinances” are sort of the Christian version of “nature.” But by nature, we don’t mean “just the way things are,” but rather, “the way God programmed things to be.” Continue reading
Douglas Wilson’s second chapter in Father Hunger takes on the task of debunking egalitarianism, explaining masculinity as an objective concept, and then proposing that fathers are to lead their families with an eye towards the distant future. This is a foundational vision which will shape the thesis of the entire book, and it is likely one of the areas that will be most in dispute. It will be in dispute by many Christians as well as non-Christians, and so it will require the right mixture of intellectual power and a good sense of humor. Wilson gives us both. For now we’ll just look at his treatment of egalitarianism.
I received an advance reader’s copy of Douglas Wilson’s Father Hunger: Why God Calls Men To Love And Lead Their Families several months ago, but I didn’t manage to actually read it until a month later. Atop that, after reading it, I had planned to write a review of it, but also allowed another month to pass. So this is no longer “advance.” Still, I very much enjoyed the book, finding it engaging on an intellectual level and helpful on a personal level– me being a new dad and all. So I do intend to review Father Hunger here, but it will now be a series of posts, taking the various chapters in order as I reread them. I’ll probably skip a chapter or two, or at least combine some, but for the most part I’ll be going through them individually.
You can find “20 Quotes from Father Hunger” over at the desiringGod blog. As good as those are, I have to say that they are the “safe” ones, suited for the broader Evangelical audience. I plan to give you the full Wilson treatment here, particularly highlighting all of his funny, manly, tough-talking, and almost-dirty-but-not-quite-because-we’re-talking-about-real-life stuff. This book’s got some chutzpah, and long-time Wilson fans won’t be disappointed. It is a blend of what you’ll find in his earlier books on marriage and family, with the obvious qualification that it is directed towards fathers.
Pastor Wilson also relies on the work of George Gilder’s Men and Marriage. The thesis of that book is basically that men will either be horndogging scoundrels or they will get married, and for the sake of civil society, we should encourage the latter. Pastor Wilson whimsically follows this theme in one of his subtitles: “Fight Crime, Get Married.”
At this point I would also want add the contribution of Denis De Rougemont’s Love in the Western World. De Rougement argues that erotic love is at war with civil society, causing men to rush off into affairs, adultery, and even death. The great antidote is, of course, marriage. And while one might not agree with all of De Rougement’s religious and historical genealogizing (he connects it all to a medieval theological heresy), his basic point is true: the passions must not rule us but rather be ruled by us. C. S. Lewis puts it more simply, “Love ceases to be a demon only when he ceases to be god.”
What this has to do with Father Hunger should be plain, and Pastor Wilson explains it ably. Men have been lead away from Fatherhood by the supposed virtues of our modern culture. They follow after romance, independence, and avarice, but the end result is not a dreamy blessedness, but rather permanent adolescence. The only way out of this muck is to man up. And so throughout Father Hunger, Pastor Wilson addresses the Biblical command for maturity, male leadership, and the goodness of marriage and children. He explains the various competing ideologies in our society today and how they pull against marriage and fatherhood. And he concludes the book with practical advice on how to be a father, directing it to those who currently are fathers, to those who will be fathers, and, most importantly, to those who have never had fathers.
Pastor Wilson’s first chapter, serving as the introduction, lays out the basic vision. The solution to a broken society is to reclaim the concept of a well-pleased father. When daddy ain’t happy, ain’t nobody happy. And the only way to recover happy paternal relations temporally is to first recover them spiritually and eternally:
In human history, there will never be a more perfect father-and-son moment than this moment between Father and Son [alluding to Jesus’ baptism in the Jordan river Matt. 3:16-17–SW]. This is the keynote–pleasure. This is the pitch that a father/son relationship needs to match– “well pleased.” (p 12)
And so it is that Pastor Wilson begins to show us how to be well-pleasing fathers and have well-pleasing families, all by finding pleasure in our father in heaven. I will continue this review in the upcoming posts.